CO129-294 - Governor Sir Blake - 1899 [10-12] — Page 137

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

No. 360.

Sir,

COPY

134

General Post Office,

Hong Kong, 19th May, 1899.

I have the honour to acknowledge receipt

of your letter dated the 23rd January last in which

you state that the paragraph in your Directors' letter

to which reference was made was written on the assumption

that the Indian Mails were shipped from Hong Kong for conveyance to India and that you now understand that with the exception of a few instances the Hong Kong Mails for conveyance to India have been

shipped to Colombo. You state that you are still of

opinion that the Company are entitled to payment for

the carriage of the Indian Mails in the terms of an

agreement entered into between the Postmaster General

and the Superintendent of your Company in June 1888.

I should be obliged if you would kindly

inform me whether you are now prepared to admit the

claim for refund for the years 1895 and 1896 which

was put forward by the Hong Kong Government, provided

that your Company is paid by this Government for the

actual mails carried by non-contract Steamers from

Hong Kong.

H.A. Ritchie, Esq.,

Superintendent of the P. & O. Company,

HONG KONG.

Edit History

2026-05-31 09:06:18 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
No. 360. Sir, COPY 134 General Post Office, Hong Kong, 19th May, 1899. I have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter dated the 23rd January last in which you state that the paragraph in your Directors' letter to which reference was made was written on the assumption that the Indian Mails were shipped from Hong Kong for conveyance to India and that you now understand that with the exception of a few instances the Hong Kong Mails for conveyance to India have been shipped to Colombo. You state that you are still of opinion that the Company are entitled to payment for the carriage of the Indian Mails in the terms of an agreement entered into between the Postmaster General and the Superintendent of your Company in June 1888. I should be obliged if you would kindly inform me whether you are now prepared to admit the claim for refund for the years 1895 and 1896 which was put forward by the Hong Kong Government, provided that your Company is paid by this Government for the actual mails carried by non-contract Steamers from Hong Kong. H.A. Ritchie, Esq., Superintendent of the P. & O. Company, HONG KONG.
Baseline (Original)
No. 360. Sir, COPY 134 General Post Office, HongKong, 19th.. May, 1899.. I have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter dated the 23rd. January last in which you state that the paragraph in your Directors letter to which reference was made was written on the assump- tion that the Indian Mails were shipped from Hong- Kong for conveyance to India and that you now under- stand that with the exception of a few instances the HongKong Mails for conveyance to India have been shipped to Colombo out state that you are still of opinion that the Company are entitled to payment for the carriage of the Indian Malls in the terms of an agreement entered into between the Postmaster General and the Superintendent of your Company in June 1888. I should be obliged if you would kindly inform me whether you are now prepared to admit the claim for refund for the years 1895 and 1896 which 18 put forward by the HongKong Government, provided that your Company is paid by this Government for the actual mails carried by non-contract Steamers from HongKong H.A.Ritchie, Esq.' Superintendent of the F and 0 Company, B Ô N G K NG
2026-05-31 09:06:18 · Baseline
View content

No. 360.

Sir,

COPY

134

General Post Office,

HongKong, 19th.. May, 1899..

I have the honour to acknowledge receipt

of your letter dated the 23rd. January last in which

you state that the paragraph in your Directors letter

to which reference was made was written on the assump-

tion that the Indian Mails were shipped from Hong-

Kong for conveyance to India and that you now under-

stand that with the exception of a few instances the

HongKong Mails for conveyance to India have been

shipped to Colombo out state that you are still of

opinion that the Company are entitled to payment for

the carriage of the Indian Malls in the terms of an

agreement entered into between the Postmaster General

and the Superintendent of your Company in June 1888.

I should be obliged if you would kindly

inform me whether you are now prepared to admit the

claim for refund for the years 1895 and 1896 which

18 put forward by the HongKong Government, provided

that your Company is paid by this Government for the

actual mails carried by non-contract Steamers from

HongKong

H.A.Ritchie, Esq.'

Superintendent of the F and 0 Company,

B Ô N G K Ở NG

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.